if jeseus is only the mediater for the 144,000, and wts now says the 'system' may outlast the remenent, then the earth would be without a mediater between man and god?
"Jehovah is Savior", "Causes to Become Saves", and "Jah saves" all mean the same thing, after all. It's 3 different ways of expressing the same thing. I'm glad we can agree on at least a few things, even if some like to play Devil's Advocate sometimes.
— I am Q. Bert, after all.
i think most of you already know what i have been planning.
i have mentioned it somewhat already.
i have sent bits of pieces of my story to several christian ministries, and they want to know more.
betterdaze, a.k.a. ~Sue
From Wikipedia: In Internet terminology, a troll is a person who enters an established community such as an online discussion forum and intentionally tries to cause disruption, often in the form of posting messages that are inflammatory, insulting, incorrect, inaccurate, absurd, or off-topic, with the intent of provoking a reaction from others.
Actually, intentionally trying to cause a disruption of a negative, confused thought patterns and trying to cause a positive reaction from others is what good conversation is all about. It would certainly be counterproductive if I were to be intentionally inflammatory, insulting, incorrect, inaccurate, absurd, or off-topic. Thank you for that knowledge. So, I am not a troll, then. — I am Q. Bert, after all.
if jeseus is only the mediater for the 144,000, and wts now says the 'system' may outlast the remenent, then the earth would be without a mediater between man and god?
You read it and come to your conclusions. I'll do the same. To each, his own.
— I am Q. Bert, after all.
i think most of you already know what i have been planning.
i have mentioned it somewhat already.
i have sent bits of pieces of my story to several christian ministries, and they want to know more.
Honestly, how do you define "troll"?
— I am Q. Bert, after all.
i think most of you already know what i have been planning.
i have mentioned it somewhat already.
i have sent bits of pieces of my story to several christian ministries, and they want to know more.
This is http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/130390/2318016/reply.ashx, after all.
— Q. Bert's take on things.
this is a question i've had for a long time.. according to the biblical account, adam and eve's sin was to eat fruit from the forbidden tree.. now, ordinarily, when we get caught doing something "wrong," we try to hide the "offending" member (the child tries to hide his hand that has the 'stolen' cookie; we hurriedly try to pull our pants back on when mom walks in unexpectedly while we're masturbating, etc.)..
so, if the "sin" of adam and eve was eating a forbidden fruit, then why wasn't their first impulse to hide their hands?
or to wipe off their mouths?
Both liars' words and true words are in the Bible. Context and outcomes can show which is which.
— I am Q. Bert, after all.
if jeseus is only the mediater for the 144,000, and wts now says the 'system' may outlast the remenent, then the earth would be without a mediater between man and god?
You will believe what you want. — I am Q. Bert, after all.
if jeseus is only the mediater for the 144,000, and wts now says the 'system' may outlast the remenent, then the earth would be without a mediater between man and god?
The Mediator is saying that his Father's the boss, and do what the boss says. We better do it.
"Jesus" means "Jehovah is the Savior". So the attention goes primarily to Jehovah God, the Author of all scripture.
16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. — 2 Tim. 3: 16-17, with footnote interpolated.
this is a question i've had for a long time.. according to the biblical account, adam and eve's sin was to eat fruit from the forbidden tree.. now, ordinarily, when we get caught doing something "wrong," we try to hide the "offending" member (the child tries to hide his hand that has the 'stolen' cookie; we hurriedly try to pull our pants back on when mom walks in unexpectedly while we're masturbating, etc.)..
so, if the "sin" of adam and eve was eating a forbidden fruit, then why wasn't their first impulse to hide their hands?
or to wipe off their mouths?
Support the serpent's words if you like. As for me, I stand by Genesis 3:4, Numbers 23:19, and John 8:44.
"You will not certainly die," the serpent said to the woman. — Gen.3:4, TNIV.
God is not a human, that he should lie,
not a human being, that he should change his mind.
Does he speak and then not act?
Does he promise and not fulfill? — Num.23:19, TNIV.
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. — Jn. 8:44.
— Q. Bert's take.
this is a question i've had for a long time.. according to the biblical account, adam and eve's sin was to eat fruit from the forbidden tree.. now, ordinarily, when we get caught doing something "wrong," we try to hide the "offending" member (the child tries to hide his hand that has the 'stolen' cookie; we hurriedly try to pull our pants back on when mom walks in unexpectedly while we're masturbating, etc.)..
so, if the "sin" of adam and eve was eating a forbidden fruit, then why wasn't their first impulse to hide their hands?
or to wipe off their mouths?
Now, this is a question I ask in all honesty, and without any intent to offend: Are you implying that you are simply using the Biblical framework as a way to structure your life...and that, in and of itself, the Bible has no divinely unique and otherwise irreplaceable meaning?
I try to look beyond the individual words, commas, and chapters to get a sense of the actual meaning and impact to my life and understanding.
From my understanding, yes He has the ABILITY to see everything. Ability being the key word.
God's omniscience is like surveillance tape. He has a way of keeping track of things, and reacting to creation when it fits his pupose and time-table.
— Q. Bert's takes on things.
